Verified publication formats
The original OJS HTML galley and the complete typeset PDF were preserved. Use the HTML reading view for accessible browsing and the PDF as the authoritative version of record.
Ethical Review of Social SciencesVolume 1, issue 2Pages 7–1831 December 2025https://doi.org/10.70150/khvbn767
Moral dimension is a characteristic feature of most transformative developments that have occurred in the course of human history. Moral outrage has fuelled numerous upheavals, uprisings, and revolutions. Researchers have recognized the important role of moral outrage during periods of social and political change. However, they usually tend to explain it by social, political, or economic factors. They rarely trace this phenomenon to purely moral factors. This article argues that the primary source of moral outrage lies in the moral sphere – specifically, in the discrepancy between the widely recognized moral principles and the actual practice. The imperative of equality is arguably the most important and fundamental principle that underpins the existence of morality. The appeal of the imperative of equality transcends temporal and cultural boundaries. Yet despite this broad appeal, our social practice accepts, tolerates, and perpetuates inequality. This article calls this discrepancy the moral predicament. The article will analyse the factors that are involved in the making of the moral predicament. It will identify the source of the imperative of equality and will explain why this imperative has not been realized in practice. The article will also consider several relevant issues, such as the rise of consciousness and morality. Finally, the article will offer a perspective on how the problem of the moral predicament can be solved.
The original OJS HTML galley and the complete typeset PDF were preserved. Use the HTML reading view for accessible browsing and the PDF as the authoritative version of record.
Use the preserved version-of-record PDF for reading and citation, together with the machine-readable metadata supplied for scholarly services.
Bibliography text preserved from the legacy article record. The version-of-record PDF remains authoritative for punctuation and layout.
A moderated scholarly-comment feature is planned for a later platform phase. Corrections or substantive concerns may currently be directed to the editorial office.
Contact the journalNo public discussion is attached to this record.